The Constitution of the United States is an outline for a government that serves its people. It is designed to prevent tyranny by limiting the power of government, both federal and state.
No part of the Constitution was designed to be interpreted in isolation of the rest of the Constitution. The Constitution must always be interpreted in its entirety and its intent. The most obvious method to destroy the Constitution is for courts to repeatedly interpret only one part of the constitution in isolation from the rest. It does not take long for the Constitution to be dismantled in this manner, one decision at a time that become precedents for ignoring other parts of the Constitution.
The issues are state laws passed and enforced that violate the U.S. Constitution. The relevant laws are:
Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the Constitution. (a.k.a the Contract Clause)
Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution. (a.k.a the Supremacy Clause)
U.S. Constitution - Article I Section 10: Powers Denied States No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. |
1. A non-disclosure agreement is a legal contract that protects information from publication. Generally the contractor compensates the contractee in exchange for the obligation of the contractee to not publish the information.
2. The contractor can break the non-disclosure contract by publishing the information himself. If the contractor publishes the contract’s information, the contractee is no longer under obligation to not disclose the same information. Further, the contractee does not have to return what was given to her in exchange for her silence.
3. The knowledge of the existence of a non-disclosure contract with certain people, because of the specialty of their professions, fame, or notoriety, can be a defacto publication of the information of a non-disclosure contract. Such as a non-disclosure contract between a porn-star and President Trump.
4. In order to not effectively publish the information of a non-disclosure contract with a porn-star, President Trump used other names for the ledger entry.
5. New York prosecuted President Trump claiming that New York law required him to defacto publish the information of a non-disclosure contract, and thus terminate the contractee’s obligation under the contract.
6. Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the constitution expressly forbids states from interfering in contractual obligations.
Question #1: Does Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the Constitution prohibit New York from making laws that require the contractor to break non-disclosure contracts and thus end the contractee’s contractual obligation?
7. New York used its police powers to arrest and compel President Trump to go trial.
Question #2: Does the State of New York have any legal authority to pass or enforce laws prohibited by the constitution?
8. New York claimed that non-disclosure contracts that conceal serious crimes that cause direct harm to others, are illegal, and therefore not valid. However, the compensation for the non-disclosure contract was President Trump’s own money. There was no theft, or serious crime.
Question 3: Can a state pass a law that is prohibited by the Constitution because it interferes with contractual obligations, and then claim the violation of that prohibited law is a serious crime?
Question 4: If the answer to Questions #2 and #3 above is no, did New York falsely arrest President Trump?
Note: Non-disclosure contracts protect information from publication. Contracts that prevent a particular person from disclosing information that has already been published, are not non-disclosure contracts.
U.S. Constitution - Article VI Clause 2 This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. |
9. Article VI, Clause 2 expressly requires all judges in every state to treat the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land, that overrides all state laws.
Question #5: Did the New York judge in this case willfully violate his express constitutional responsibility under Article VI, Clause 2 by permitting New York to prosecute President Trump for breaking New York laws prohibited by the Constitution?
Question #6: Does Article VI, Clause 2 permit judges to consider only the parts of the constitution that presented in cases by attorneys, and by extension, to ignore parts of the constitution not identified by attorneys in cases?
Question #7: Or, does Article VI, Clause 2 require all judges to consider the entire constitution in all cases, regardless of what the attorneys for any party present?